Table 13.7: Scoping of wider
determinants of health
Determinant |
Commentary |
Proposed
scope |
|
Access |
|||
A1 Access to local public and key services and facilities |
The nature of the Proposed Scheme is unlikely to affect provision of
local public and key services and facilities temporarily or permanently.
Access issues relating to accessibility and connectivity are discussed below
under the theme of traffic and transport. |
It is proposed to consider access in relation to impacts on traffic
and transport only (see scope for T6 and T7). |
|
A2 Access to good quality affordable housing |
The land use and accessibility assessment will assess impacts on
residential property. However, the Proposed Scheme will not have a
significant influence on the availability of good quality affordable housing,
which is influenced more by housing policy and market demand, and so no
likely significant population level health effects from the Proposed Scheme are
anticipated. |
Scoped out for construction and operation. |
|
A3 Access to healthy affordable food |
It is not anticipated that the Proposed Scheme will significantly
influence access to healthy affordable food, therefore this is not considered
a likely significant effect. |
Scoped out for construction and operation. |
|
A4 Access to the natural environment |
The Proposed Scheme is within both urban and rural landscapes and has
the potential to affect access in the local vicinity. The Proposed Scheme has
the potential to affect access between settlements and the countryside via
public footpaths and local roads. There are also a number
of open green spaces that sit within the urban environmental
surrounding the Proposed Scheme to which access could potentially be affected.
This includes access to outdoor recreational facilities, including parks,
playing fields and cycleways. |
Scoped in for construction and operation. It is proposed to assess
potential health impacts by considering these determinants together under ‘access
to the natural environment and outdoor recreation’ |
|
A5 Access to the natural environment within the urban environment |
|
||
A6 Access to leisure, recreation and physical
activities within the urban and natural environment |
|
||
Traffic and transport |
|||
T1 Accessibility |
The Proposed Scheme has the potential to affect some pedestrian routes
and roads at least temporarily. Further investigation is required to
understand if there are existing barriers to accessibility and if so, whether
there are opportunities to address these through the Proposed Scheme design. |
Scoped in for construction and operation. It is proposed to assess
this under ‘accessibility for walking and cycling’ (to combine the
determinants T1, T3 and T4 due the interrelated nature of these issues). |
|
T2 Access to/by public transport |
The existing M60, M62 and M66 are not used to access bus services.
While there is potential for disruption to bus services during construction
due to traffic management, bus providers have the option of re-routing
services and overall provision of services would remain unchanged by the
Proposed Scheme. The Proposed Scheme is also unlikely to affect the provision
of both bus and tram services within the Study Area. This is therefore not
considered a likely significant population health effect. |
Scoped out for construction and operation. |
|
T3 Opportunities for access by cycling and walking |
There may be opportunities to improve provision for
walkers and cyclists as a result of the Proposed
Scheme, including improving highway crossing provision opportunities. Access
on some routes may be disrupted during construction. |
Scoped in for construction and operation. It is proposed to assess
this as under ‘accessibility for walking and cycling’ (to combine the
determinants T1, T3 and T4 due the interrelated nature of these issues). |
|
T4 Links between communities |
The existing motorways linking to the M60 J18 limit links between the
communities of Simister, Unsworth, Whitefield/Besses o’ th’ Barn and Prestwich and Kirkhams
to a small number of crossing points (see Table 13.4). It is not anticipated
there would be any significant impact on these links, except in relation to
potential for improvements to accessibility for walkers, cyclists and horse
riders as identified under T1 and T3. |
Scoped in for construction and operation. It is proposed to assess
this under ‘accessibility, walking and cycling’ (to combine the
determinants T1, T3 and T4 due the interrelated nature of these issues). |
|
T5 Community severance |
The Proposed Scheme has the potential to influence traffic flows on
the wider road network, some of which may result in increases or alleviation
of community severance. Further information is required to investigate the
locations of changes to traffic flows and whether changes are of a scale that
may affect existing levels of severance or cause new severance. It is
proposed to assess this for operational traffic flows only. There is also
potential to address existing severance through inclusion of new safe
crossing points that would help re-connect community networks and support
community cohesion. Since community severance and social cohesion are
considered longer-term issues, it is proposed to assess this during the
operational phase only. Potential disruption to community access from
construction activities will be considered under ‘accessibility for walking
and cycling’ and ‘connections to employment, services, facilities and leisure’.
|
Scoped in for operation. |
|
T6 Connections to jobs |
The construction phase of the Proposed Scheme has the
potential to disrupt connectivity. Once in operation there is potential for
improved ease of access between communities and employment, services and leisure opportunities as a result of
improvements to road, cycling and pedestrian infrastructure. |
Scoped in for construction and operation. It is proposed the assess T6
and T7 together under the combined determinant ‘connections to employment,
services, facilities and leisure’. |
|
T7 Connections to services, facilities and
leisure opportunities |
|
||
Socioeconomic |
|||
S1 Employment opportunities including training opportunities |
The Proposed Scheme may generate employment or training opportunities
associated with the construction phase of works. If appropriately targeted,
these opportunities could address some health inequalities. Social value
opportunities will be explored for consideration as part of the Proposed
Scheme. As a highway project, the Proposed Scheme will not generate many
direct employment opportunities in operation and so this is not a likely
significant effect on population health. |
Scoped in for construction only. |
|
S2 Local business activity |
The Proposed Scheme is unlikely to affect local business activity, no
businesses are required to be demolished. |
Scoped out for construction and operation. |
|
S3 Regeneration |
Facilitating regeneration is not a direct objective of the
Project, and the population and health baseline has not identified any
potential regeneration areas within the study area for land use and access. |
Scoped out for construction and operation. |
|
S4 Tourism and leisure industries |
The tourism and leisure industry is
not identified as a key industry within the study area and the Proposed
Scheme is unlikely to greatly influence this area of the economy. Therefore,
this is not considered a likely significant issue for population health in
the study area. |
Scoped out for construction and operation. |
|
S5 Community/social cohesions and access to social networks |
The main pathway between the Proposed Scheme and effects on this
determinant would be via accessibility, pedestrian interaction, links between
communities and community severance as scoped under T1, T3, T4 and T5 above. |
It is proposed to consider community/social cohesions and access to
social networks as part of the assessment of accessibility, walking and
cycling, and community severance. |
|
S6 Community engagement |
Consultation and stakeholder engagement will be undertaken as part of
the Proposed Scheme but it is unlikely that there
will be any impacts on community engagement as part of the construction and
operation of the Proposed Scheme. |
Scoped out for construction and operation. |
|
Land Use |
|||
L1 Land use in urban and/or rural settings |
The land use and accessibility assessment will assess
impacts on existing land use due to the footprint of the Proposed Scheme.
However, the impacts are likely to be relatively localised
to the existing interchange area and not likely to result in a likely
significant effect in terms of population health, over and above the issues
scoped in above such as access to outdoor recreation for local communities. |
Scoped out for construction and operation. |
|
L2 Quality of urban and natural environments |
The Proposed Scheme has the potential to increase or
decrease exposure of local communities to air and noise pollution, as well as
access to areas of greenspace. . |
Scoped in for construction and operation. |
|